tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.comments2022-12-10T08:37:24.353-05:00Thought FragmentsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13880958127943576318noreply@blogger.comBlogger611125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-76212875972728843982022-07-11T03:27:05.662-04:002022-07-11T03:27:05.662-04:00Lovely bloog you haveLovely bloog you haveKianhttps://www.kianfinnegan.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-82563031898377615392015-04-04T19:24:56.235-04:002015-04-04T19:24:56.235-04:00I just started reading more about AGW and...
I ju...<i>I just started reading more about AGW and...</i><br /><br />I just started reading more about psychology so now I know I'm qualified to fix people better than those shady professional shrinks with their advanced degrees and stuff.<br /><br /><i>The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability to be much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude.</i><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effectJim Spriggsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-81533107787818382282015-03-29T20:55:11.403-04:002015-03-29T20:55:11.403-04:00Thanks. Unfortunately, this always takes so much t...Thanks. Unfortunately, this always takes so much time.Jan P Perlwitzhttp://climateconomysociety.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-16963474335680584432015-03-29T01:33:29.829-04:002015-03-29T01:33:29.829-04:00Hello Jan, I just found your site after reading yo...Hello Jan, I just found your site after reading your great comments over at Judith Curry's blog (Lessons from the ‘Irreducibly Simple’ kerfuffle). I then saw your familiar looking "banned" screenshots and thought I would post mine--a bit lower level of sophistication, but unable to post my arguments nonetheless. It was only my second post on James Delingpole's deck-of-victim-cards rant on Breitbart about the NYT's treatment of Willie Soon's shillery (and I think my first post was pulled as well). It was the first time I've ever been to Breitbart and my posts were tame by my standards. I've been banned from City Data (accused of spamming--really?) and PJ Media (for "third rate trolling") but only after at least a--well those happened after only one or two posts also--never mind. These people have a low tolerance for refutation. Thanks for fighting the good fight.Jim Spriggsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-47195765963189400962015-03-06T17:56:47.872-05:002015-03-06T17:56:47.872-05:00ATTP:
You are the perfect example of a preening se...ATTP:<br />You are the perfect example of a preening self righteous ass.<br />Deal with it.<br />Why dont you try to answer the effing questions.<br />As if conservation of energy has ANYTHING to do with running a regression scheme that regresses a variable on itself.<br />Youre too arrogant to even be aware of what an ass you are.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-66708021088250183782015-03-06T17:54:00.654-05:002015-03-06T17:54:00.654-05:00go eff yourself.go eff yourself.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-50474629262584814732015-03-06T17:45:20.075-05:002015-03-06T17:45:20.075-05:00Just so you know, this same commenter (or, at leas...Just so you know, this same commenter (or, at least, someone using the same name) lasted (IIRC) two comments on my blog before I deleted the comment with essentially the same tactic ("answer the question!"). You have more patience than I have - although, maybe this is why I'm regarded as censorious :-)There's Physicsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-22761302488907727482015-03-05T19:32:18.350-05:002015-03-05T19:32:18.350-05:00Ditto, ditto & ditto
They aren't called ...Ditto, ditto & ditto<br /><br /><br />They aren't called dittoheads for nothingMnestheusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-60577944878426385812015-03-03T14:29:57.637-05:002015-03-03T14:29:57.637-05:00Who gives an eff what you write or say or think. a...Who gives an eff what you write or say or think. anonymous troll.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-49122120434388872882015-03-03T07:26:44.607-05:002015-03-03T07:26:44.607-05:00Kudos to you, Jan, for having the stamina to even ...Kudos to you, Jan, for having the stamina to even read these convoluted obfuscations.SageThinkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-5409078692055636482015-03-03T07:24:14.993-05:002015-03-03T07:24:14.993-05:00dude, you're creepy.dude, you're creepy.SageThinkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-39865247579925683592015-03-02T01:12:31.743-05:002015-03-02T01:12:31.743-05:00Your behavior would make stalin proud Jan. And to ...Your behavior would make stalin proud Jan. And to think that you, a jew, would engage in this type of revisionism. Your actions sicken me.<br />Erase my posts, its okay, the world knows what youre all about.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-10032805559830192422015-03-01T23:33:45.098-05:002015-03-01T23:33:45.098-05:00No. I asked first, give them your best shot Jan.No. I asked first, give them your best shot Jan.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-36806598170569590302015-03-01T23:33:44.062-05:002015-03-01T23:33:44.062-05:00dude you get an email you dont agree with and your...dude you get an email you dont agree with and your threaten to report it to the police. [abusive - mod.] deal with it.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-89427645063570301662015-03-01T23:33:43.077-05:002015-03-01T23:33:43.077-05:00projection, jan. projection.projection, jan. projection.davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-66725496327496894972015-03-01T23:33:42.078-05:002015-03-01T23:33:42.078-05:00[Abusive - mod]
[Abusive - mod]<br />davideisenstadtnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-70782988738652485642015-03-01T23:33:40.855-05:002015-03-01T23:33:40.855-05:00Technically what Christopher Monckton claimed whic...Technically what Christopher Monckton claimed which was wrong was that he was a member of the House of Lords. He has been<a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2011/july/letter-to-viscount-monckton/" rel="nofollow">rebuked by the Clerk of the Parliaments</a> for this claim multiple times He is a Viscount by inheritance and thus, Eli guesses, technically a Lord,Eli Rabettnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-73864079321738884832015-03-01T23:33:40.060-05:002015-03-01T23:33:40.060-05:00"...he is a paid climate-Communist troll..&qu..."...he is a paid climate-Communist troll.."Robertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-63156879388500072462015-03-01T23:33:39.701-05:002015-03-01T23:33:39.701-05:00It is not for me to complain. The American Physica...It is not for me to complain. The American Physical Society, if it recovers some regard for the truth, will in time be shamed into doing the right thing.James Rowlatthttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-27062134709851204432015-03-01T23:33:35.076-05:002015-03-01T23:33:35.076-05:00I have tried my best, as I always do, to be polite...I have tried my best, as I always do, to be polite. And I should have hoped that in these egalitarian times a working man doing his best would not be described as a "flunkey".James Rowlatthttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-80527285882613410472015-03-01T23:33:34.073-05:002015-03-01T23:33:34.073-05:00There was no disclaimer above Lord Monckton's ...There was no disclaimer above Lord Monckton's paper in the original, printed or online versions July 2008 edition of Physics and Society. And the fudge-box at the end of the issue said the journal published "reviewed" articles. And it is clear from the file that His Lordship's paper was carefully and meticulously reviewed. It is also clear that subsequently not one but two versions of an untruthful disclaimer to the effect that His Lordship's paper had not been peer-reviewed appeared in the online version (but not in the printed version: it was too late for that). At the same time as the first of the two disclaimers, the fudge-box was tampered with so that it stated that the journal published "non-peer-reviewed" articles, a practice that has been followed ever since.<br /><br /><br />I conclude from the evidence of the printed copy, and of previous editions that one can inspect online, that at the time when His Lordship was invited to submit his paper, on the recommendation of a senior scientist at the Argonne National Laboratory, it was the practice of the journal to publish reviewed papers. I further conclude from the file that Lord Monckton's paper was indeed reviewed. Finally, I conclude that thereafter, as His Lordship might colorfully put it, someone moved the goalposts in an attempt to discredit His Lordship and his paper. His Lordship is well accustomed to such ill-treatment, which does not reflect any credit either on the American Physical Society or on those who now try to misrepresent the position all over again.James Rowlatthttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-49711805198337202572015-03-01T23:33:33.058-05:002015-03-01T23:33:33.058-05:00And I want to apologize to our hosts; you are doin...And I want to apologize to our hosts; you are doing an exemplary job working through the paper in question and lowering myself to the level of monckton's replies was unnecessary.<br /><br />Thank you for the time and quality of work put into the postingsRobertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-56712352986343200412015-03-01T23:33:32.048-05:002015-03-01T23:33:32.048-05:00I know that. Both points. I did go to school you k...I know that. Both points. I did go to school you know.fragmeister12noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-48502087880784663462015-03-01T23:33:31.085-05:002015-03-01T23:33:31.085-05:00Was that the one where you claimed to cure AIDS (r...Was that the one where you claimed to cure AIDS (rather than exile the sufferers)? How is that cure coming along?fragmeister12noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4131539343931662541.post-76680301519853068332015-03-01T23:33:30.088-05:002015-03-01T23:33:30.088-05:00James, I think you missed some responses to scient...James, I think you missed some responses to scientific points that begin with inane insults from His Lordship. You sound quite a lot like him. Are you by any chance related? No, you are employed by him and thus hardly an independent witness. I can, and will continue to, make up my own mind. Since His Lordship is keen on following proper scientific procedure, perhaps he will abstain in future from the insulting epithets, the threats of legal action and the letters to various employers while engaging fully with the scientific points that have been raised in all seriousness by other commenters. His dancing around the subject with regard to Hansen 1988 is a case in point and not one which stands alone.fragmeister12noreply@blogger.com