Showing posts with label statistical significance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label statistical significance. Show all posts
Friday, January 31, 2014

No "hiatus" (pause/stop) in global ocean warming up to year 2013

›
Although much of the public focus regarding global warming is on the temperature increase near Earth's surface, the Arctic sea ice dec...
Sunday, June 23, 2013

Is there evidence for a statistically significant trend change in the global surface temperature data?

›
Update: When one starts the trend analysis in 1999, using the the same tools as below, it takes the year 1998 with the strong El Nino out ...
Saturday, June 15, 2013

Declared persona non grata at wattsupwiththat.com

›
Update, 07/07/2013: See Anthony Watts' comment below and my reply. ----- I just have tested the new approach , announced in April b...
4 comments:
Friday, April 12, 2013

What got me snipped from wattsupwiththat.com - 11

›
Werner Brozek wrote a new article at wattsupwiththat.com about his research on noise in the global temperature record. The reply below to ...
Wednesday, February 27, 2013

What got me snipped from wattsupwiththat.com - 9

›
Today, I got (temporarily, I was told. I will see) banished from posting comments on the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) denier blog wat...
Friday, January 25, 2013

How to create a false "global warming standstill"

›
One choose a data set of global tropospheric (e.g., UAH, RSS) or surface temperature estimates (e.g., NASA/GISS, NOAA/NCDC, HadCRU), prefe...
Thursday, August 23, 2012

Has global warming stopped? - An examination of a fake skeptic's argument

›
I'm documenting here my reply I gave somewhere else to a couple of talking points that are frequently used in the fake skeptic universe....